Related topics

Another flaw in C?
I originally installed NT 4.0 on a system with a single PPro 180 on a dual processor motherboard. Now that another cpu has been added, I'm seeing no evidence that the either my bios or NT is seeing it. I'm running SP2 with all the applicable hotfixes. Is there something else I'm missing?

Computer Specs
This app copies and replace hal.dll and some other important files and make the system ready for a second processor. I used the upgraded version. I execute Uptomp.exe and do what the app tells me. Sure thing. Then I reboot. Now comes the problem...."NTFS.sys is missing or corrupt". And system startup is halted.

P6DNF second processor problem
Issuing *OS9 doesn't result in any floppy or hard disk activity, so it looks like I'm either missing a parameter to *OS9 (tried the obvious /H0, H0 etc.) which tells it which device to boot from, the floppy drive is stone dead (will rule that out tomorrow), or there's a hardware fault with the Cumana board.

SS20 CPU problem
This update is automatically generated by my machine, so please email me at pvi...@interalpha.co.uk if any parts are missing or corrupted. 2.2) What is a second processor and what second processors are there? 2.3) Can PC VGA & Multisync Monitors be added to an Acorn machine? 2.4) Are there any Acorn cards for

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org
You need to run uptomp.exe (for "up to Multi Processor") to upgrade your HAL to SMP. But..... As always with M$ there are some things you have to consider before you do anything; the .inf file that goes with uptomp is incomplete. I can't just now find which file is missing. You should be able to find this on any of

CrApple Stock lose $10 Billion in 24 hours - sincrap look ...
3) Adds missing headers to the following files, Signed-Off-By: Chirag <chi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Acked-By: Dinakar Guniguntala <d...@in.ibm.com>, Acked-By: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.du...@bull.net> Modified File(s): ltp/testcases/realtime/func/pi-tests/parse-testpi1.py

PASS Form-Processor-0.18 i686-linux-64int 2.6.16-2-k7
Juan Pineyro anonym...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows server general I just ried both solutions and I'm still in the same boat. I haven't rebooted after making the changes because this server is a production server. Will try a reboot after hours. Let me know if you can think of anything else.

PASS Form-Processor-0.17 i386-freebsd-thread-multi 6.2-release
Particle Salad psa...@earthlink.net comp sys atari advocacy sinc...@nospam.net wrote: Are we talking about Apple's G4 sales or missing their financial target? Again, people didn't bite on the Cube, but also people just aren't all that excited about dual processor machines where that 2nd processor is mostly

OS for dual cpu board?
That Remove option is missing from Home Edition, but may be present in Pro. That Add/Remove is one powerful tool, that could be dangerous in a clean freaks F10? so you can choose the multiple processor? Something like that. Although you may end up pulling the second processor anyway, so you can repair your

Adding Second Processor to NT 4.0 SP3
*Lyric quote song* Conditional jumps were missing, but since the 1960s.Some technologies invented and improved during the decade ended in July 1983. Lyric quote song The second processor for the five operating systems and incompatibility was more sympathetic to software development.

Lightwave on BeOS?
... Turner" <wayne_tur...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:0e2301c3295c$b8678d30$a001280a@phx.gbl... I recently added a second processor to my dell server. Shows up in the BIOS but does not show up when you go to task manager. Is this correct or is there something I am Missing? SBS2000 os. Thanks for any help.

Linux Terminology
I did have mandrake 7.1 running okay but wanted to install windows. Will I have to get win2000 or nt4 as an OS or am I missing the obvious?? Well, ME should run on ONE of the two processors, but only an NT class O/S (such as Win2K or WinNT) will run the second processor. RwP.

Missing 2nd Processor
Using it would mean that parts of the os for itself are running on th 2nd cpu to get speedups or something like that. IN FACT: isn't the ideal OS the one which takes NO processor time away from the application whilst still managing resources? well that is impossible DO NOT services make up part of the OS? well

PASS Form-Processor-0.18 i686-linux-64int 2.6.22-1-k7
FAILED tests 1-7 Failed 7/7 tests, 0.00% okay t/10-Field-HtmlArea...........skipped all skipped: Missing recommended module [HTML::Tidy] t/10-Field-Integer............Use of reserved word "our" is deprecated at /mnt/i386/usr/local/src/CPAN/build/Form- Processor-0.18-kmYDPt/blib/lib/Form/Processor/Field/Text.pm line

Microsoft Sql Server Course
The catalog price of the second processor is such that the simple and vastly superior logic approach amkes nearly a factor of two savings. .... In 0.35 micron, a 10 bit conversion with no missing codes between 1/4 scale and 3/4 scale is 0.6 microseconds (there are no missing codes anywhere with a slow enough clock)

PASS Form-Processor-0.17 alpha-netbsd 2.1.0_stable
... Will <m...@via.www> wrote: I have an extra slot for 2nd processor, thinking of upgradingand getting 2 450's What advantages does having 2 processors have over 1, and will WIN98 If you don't know what duals procs can do for you, you're either really missing out, or you really needn't even consider the option.

PC hangs during activation and non-activation
Dear Bill Moseley, This is a computer-generated report for Form-Processor-0.18 on perl 5.8.7, created by CPAN-Reporter-1.11. Missing recommended module [DateTime::Format::DateManip] t/10-Field-DateTimeDMYHM........ok t/10-Field-DateTimeDMYHM2.......ok t/10-Field-DateTimeManip........skipped: Missing recommended

Why use a view?
Dear Bill Moseley, This is a computer-generated report for Form-Processor-0.18 on perl 5.8.6, created by CPAN-Reporter-1.11. Missing recommended module [DateTime::Format::DateManip] t/10-Field-DateTimeDMYHM........ok t/10-Field-DateTimeDMYHM2.......ok t/10-Field-DateTimeManip........skipped: Missing recommended

increasing utilization of second processor
Andy Whitcroft a...@shadowen.org linux kernel On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:03:37AM +0100, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi, [ description ] Subject: kthread: add a memory barrier to kthread_stop() 'kthread' threads do a check in the following order: - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - kthread_should_stop();

Apple II Csa2 FAQs: Error List, Part 8/25
When we remove the second processor, we get a "CPU Missing" message followed by a System Halted. There could be two problems. Most multi-processor MBs require a 'terminator' in the 'unused' CPU socket. (Not all do, but many!) The system documentation should tell you if that is true. The second issue is the "CPU